Identifying Pupils’ Mental Model of the Day and Night Concept

T Aci Parlina, Neni Hermita, Mahmud Alpusari, Eddy Noviana

Abstract


Many students and even teachers still cannot recognize the relevance of the model to build physical knowledge. The study of mental representations built by students in their interactions with the world, phenomena and artifacts, is an important line of research in science education. Therefore, it is not surprising that analogies play an important role in science education, because the construction of students in mental models of abstract phenomena must be rooted in some existing or previous experiences, to interpret more complex ideas. The purpose of this study is to investigate mental models elementary school students against the phenomenon of day and night. This research is quantitative descriptive. The research subjects were 20 students in grade six. The results showed that 20% of students had a low mental model (LMM), 45% of students had a moderate mental model (MMM), and 35% of students had a high mental model (HMM). Based on the results of the study it can be said that, (1) 20% of students cannot explain the concepts scientifically and students' understanding is at the level of symbolic representation. (2) 45% of students cannot explain the causes of a phenomenon, student understanding is at the level of macrocospic representation, (3) and 35% of students have concepts with understanding based on real-life observations with scientific concepts learned at school and students' understanding is at the level of representation of microcosms.


Keywords


mental model; analogy; mental representation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bao, L. & Warnakulasooria, R. (2002). Toward a model-based Diagnostic Instrument in Electricity and Magnetism -An Example, In PERC proceeding, Aug 2002.

Coll, R. K. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of iconic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 40 (50) , 464-486.

Chittleborough G. & Treagust D. F. (2007). The Modelling Ability Of Non-Major Chemistry Students And Their Understanding Of The Sub-Microscopic Level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 8, 274-292

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Change in Adulthood. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

Didiş, N., Ali, E., Erkoç, Ş. (2014). Investigating students’ mental models about quantization of light, energy, and angular momentum. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research 10, 020127.

De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics- Physics Education Research 8, 020117.

Darabi, A., Hemphill, J., Nelson, D. W., Boulware, W., & Liang, X. (2009). Mental Model Progression in Learnig the electron transport chain: effects of instructional strategies and cognitive flexibility.Adv in

Health Sci Educ (2010) 15:479–489.

Fazio, C, Battaglia, O.R, & Di Paolo, B. (2013). Investigating the quality of mental models deployed by undergraduate engineering students in creating explanations. The case of thermally activated phenomena. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research 9, 020101.

Khasanah, N., Wartono., & Yuliati, L. (2013). Analysis of mental model of students using isomorphic problems in dynamics of rotational motion topic. Department of Physic Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, JPII 5 (2) (2016) 186-191.

Singh, C. (2008). Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics.Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research 4, 010104.

Sugiyono, (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung. Alfabeta, cv.

Seel, N. M. (2006). Mental Models in Learning Situations. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed), Advances in Physichology (hlm.85-107). Netherlands: Elsevier B. V.

Vosniadou, S, Skopeliti, I, and Ikospentaki, K. ( 2004 ). Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy. Cogn. Dev. 19, 203–222. Doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.12.002




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v2i2.7573

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal Of Teching And Learning In Elementary Education (JTLEE)
Department of Elementary Education
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education,
Universitas of Riau
Kampus Bina Widya Km 12,5 Simpang Baru
Pekanbaru 28293 – Indonesia
email: jtlee@ejournal.unri.ac.id
 
 

 
Journal Of Teaching And Learning In Elementary Education (JTLEE) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.